chodiev fattah kayumovich ordered the murder of

from bulat utemuratov to mukhtar ablyazov

Who is behind the Kazakhgate scan­dal in the Belgian media? OSI revealed one name so far: that of the Kazakh oli­garch Bulat Utemuratov, who orches­trat­ed it in late 1990s and ear­ly 2000s. (http://www.opensourceinvestigations.com/belgium/propaganda-works-first-kazakhgate/)

Another char­ac­ter close­ly linked to Utemuratov is Mukhtar Ablyazov, a Kazakh oli­garch too, and a fugi­tive from jus­tice who is cur­rent­ly liv­ing in France.

The French newslet­ter Intelligence Online recent­ly sug­gest­ed that some mem­bers of the so-called “Kazakhgate” com­mis­sion are inter­est­ed in talk­ing to Ablyazov. (see here: https://www.intelligenceonline.com/corporate-intelligence/2017/08/23/ablyazov-s-secret-lobbying-against-chodiev,108258465-ART)

If so, this means the com­mis­sion is ready to take sides, know­ing­ly or not, in a war between https://www.opendemocracy.net two groups of Kazakh oli­garchs – a war that began decades ago.

Who is Mukhtar Ablyazov?

Ablyazov, born and bred in Kazakhstan, became tru­ly rich in 2005, when he became the own­er and chair­man of the board of direc­tors of Kazakhstan’s largest bank, BTA. In December 2004, the for­mer own­er of BTA, Yerzhan Tatishev, died in a con­tro­ver­sial hunt­ing acci­dent, being shot (alleged­ly by mis­take) by a for­mer gang­ster (see here: http://kazworld.info/?p=9486). Ablyazov then forced Tatishev’s wid­ow to sell him the share pack­age that made him the sole own­er of BTA (see here: http://kazworld.info/?p=28543).

After gain­ing own­er­ship of BTA, Ablyazov began cre­at­ing a net­work of off­shore com­pa­nies through which he man­aged to siphon bil­lions of dol­lars from the bank. The Kazakh gov­ern­ment dis­cov­ered the scheme in 2009, when it nation­al­ized BTA. According to Kazakh pros­e­cu­tors, Ablyazov man­aged to steal 7.5 bil­lion dol­lars using his net­work of dum­my corporations.

Because of the judi­cial inquiry that began in 2009, Ablyazov fled Kazakhstan to UK. In August 2009, BTA Bank launched the first of its 11 civ­il pro­ceed­ings against Ablyazov in the UK High Court.

In 2011, the United Kingdom grant­ed Ablyazov polit­i­cal asy­lum for the peri­od of tri­al proceedings.

In 2012, the High Court in London has ruled that BTA Bank is enti­tled to recov­er 2 bil­lion dol­lars in assets from Ablyazov and his asso­ciates. (https://www.ft.com/content/fa197eae-909a-11e2-a456-00144feabdc0)  Later, the same court ordered Ablyazov’s asso­ciates to pay an addi­tion­al 1.5 bil­lion dol­lars to BTA. (https://en.tengrinews.kz/crime/London-court-orders-Ablyazovs-accomplices-to-pay-over-15–17955/)

In the mean­time, in ear­ly 2012 the London court sen­tenced Ablyazov to 22 months in jail for “seri­ous” and “brazen” con­tempt of court in try­ing to hide more than 34 mil­lion pounds of assets from his BTA cred­i­tors. (https://www.theguardian.com/business/2012/feb/16/arrest-warrant-kazakh-billionaire-mukhtar-ablyazov)

Facing jail in UK, Ablyazov fled to France using a pass­port issued by the Central African Republic. In July 2013 he was locat­ed and arrest­ed by the French author­i­ties (https://www.euromoney.com/article/b12kjzckjgvs22/the-hunt-for-mukhtar-ablyazov-banker-criminal-fugitive-victim).

In 2014, a French court order allowed the French author­i­ties to extra­dite Ablyazov to Russia, where he was charged with the same crimes he was charged in Kazakhstan, since BTA also had branch­es in Russia and Ukraine. However, in December 2016 the French State Council over­ruled the order and released Ablyazov from cus­tody. (http://www.reuters.com/article/us-apps-putin-commentary-idUSKCN1B91WN)

Finally, also in 2014 the UK can­celed Ablyazov’s polit­i­cal refugee sta­tus. (http://www.lse.co.uk/sharecast-news-article.asp?ArticleCode=21616501&ArticleHeadline=UK_revokes_asylym_status_of_former_Kazakh_banker_Ablyazov)

To sum it up, Mukhtar Ablyazov is an oli­garch who com­mit­ted fraud on a very large scale. He was repeat­ed­ly con­vict­ed by a British court – he was even sen­tenced to jail for con­tempt of court. All this hap­pened in the UK, where the stan­dards of jus­tice are very high.

Mukhtar Ablyazov and Bulat Utemuratov 

According to Professor Sebastien Peyrouse from George Washington University, who wrote an exten­sive study on the neopat­ri­mo­ni­al regime in Kazakhstan, since the 1990s, two cir­cles of senior offi­cials have been in com­pe­ti­tion with one anoth­er as the rep­re­sen­ta­tives of dif­fer­ing, some­times con­tra­dic­to­ry inter­ests. One cir­cle is led by Bulat Utemuratov; the oth­er one com­pris­es, among oth­ers, Chodiev, Ibragimov and Mashkevich.

“The com­pe­ti­tion between these two net­works is struc­tured around the min­ing sec­tor. Utemuratov’s rela­tions in this sec­tor rival those of Mashkevich, whose ENRC also works in African mar­kets, the stomp­ing grounds of Glencore […]. In pub­licly for­mu­lat­ing this com­pe­ti­tion, Utemuratov played the card of Kazakh nation­al­ism, and hoped to assem­ble under his lead­er­ship Kazakh oli­garchs opposed to the pre­dom­i­nant role of non-Kazakhs. This alliance includ­ed Mukhtar Ablyazov before he fell into disgrace—whereupon Utemuratov then bought out much of his busi­ness and com­mu­ni­ca­tions empire […].” (see here, p. 365=366: https://www2.gwu.edu/~ieresgwu/assets/docs/demokratizatsiya%20archive/GWASHU_DEMO_20_4/115R0286T7381151/115R0286T7381151.pdf)

In oth­er words, Ablyazov is Utemuratov’s pupil and, to some extent, his pro­tégé. After all, when Ablyazov fled from Kazakhstan, it was Utemuratov who bought his busi­ness­es, pre­sum­ably to keep them safe from competition.

Both Ablyazov and Utemuratov belong to the ultra-nation­al­ist camp of Kazakh oli­garchs, in direct con­flict with the likes of Chodiev, Ibragimov and Mashkevich, who, as non-Kazakhs, are treat­ed as foes, not only as busi­ness competitors.

Far-right connections

Ablyazov’s grudge against the Chodiev, Ibragimov and Mashkevich is man­i­fest. On May 17 2017, for instance, he shared on his Facebook page a post by Aydos Sadykov: “Khromtau is a small town in the Aktobe region. In the 90s it was pri­va­tized by Mashkevich, Chodiev and Ibragimov. The so-called “Eurasian group” bought from the state the only chrome mines in the coun­try. In the entire post-Soviet space, chrome was mined only in two places: in Khromtau and Petrozavodsk (Karelia, Russia). Since then, Kazchrome belongs to the cit­i­zens of Israel, Belgium and Uzbekistan.” [Chodiev and Ibragimov are Uzbeks, and they also hold Belgian nation­al­i­ty; Mashkevitch holds Israeli nationality.]

To this, Ablyazov adds: “I would like to add that all these enter­pris­es got these own­ers free of charge back in the mid-1990s. Why? Because their busi­ness part­ner and co-own­er is President Nursultan Nazarbayev.

You will find nowhere the infor­ma­tion that this group will pay hun­dreds of mil­lions of dol­lars for these assets in the country’s bud­get. It’s just an enter­prise stolen from the country.

On these assets, manip­u­lat­ing the shares of these enter­pris­es, using their offi­cial posi­tion, Nazarbayev and Co. stole bil­lions of dol­lars from the National Fund. And they pay pen­nies for work­ers at these enterprises.”

Ablyazov’s Facebook post post has an unmis­tak­ably pop­ulist and nation­al­is­tic tone: Chodiev, Ibragimov and Mashkevitch are for­eign­ers – Uzbeks, Belgians and Israeli – not Kazakhstani natives. They don’t deserve to own Kazakhstani prop­er­ties that they “stole” from the Kazakh peo­ple and for which they pay noth­ing. In addi­tion, they exploit poor Kazakhstani work­ers. This is qua­si-fas­cist propaganda.

Ablyazov’s far-right views are also man­i­fest from the way he spends his mon­ey. He financed, for instance, the activ­i­ty of Dmitriy Demushkin, a Russian extrem­ist recent­ly con­vict­ed for 2.5 years for alleged­ly attend­ing a par­ty to cel­e­brate Adolf Hitler’s birth­day. Demushkin is the head of the supreme nation­al coun­cil of the Russkie asso­ci­a­tion, the chair­man of the orga­niz­ing com­mit­tee of the nation­al­ist par­ty, and the chair­man of the now-banned “Slavic Union”. (http://www.ibtimes.com/russian-nationalist-demushkin-granted-rally-permit-moscow-government-1892943)

Ablyazov was also strong­ly con­nect­ed to Alexander Potkin, who alleged­ly han­dled the assets belong­ing to Ablyazov in Russia. Potkin is a well-known Russian nation­al­ist, and the for­mer leader of the Movement Against Illegal Immigration (DPNI). (https://en.tengrinews.kz/crime/Russian-nationalist-arrested-over-Ablyazov-embezzlement-case-256927/)

Apparently, Ablyazov also financed inter-eth­nic clash­es in south Kyrgyzstan in 2010, when in just two days about half a mil­lion eth­nic Uzbeks became refugees. He alleged­ly financed those who urged the Kyrgyz to kill their neigh­bors of a dif­fer­ent nation­al­i­ty. (http://www.silkroadgazette.com/ablyazov-attempted-to-destabilize-situation-in-russia-uzbekistan-and-kyrgyzstan/)

Back to Belgium 

There is a clear con­nec­tion between Ablyazov and Utemuratov, the man who mas­ter­mind­ed the first Kazakhgate scan­dal in the late 1990s. Utemuratov’s team – Eric Van de Weghe and Le Soir’s jour­nal­ist Alain Lallemand – is still active.

There is also ample evi­dence that Ablyazov hates Chodiev, Ibragimov and Mashkevich not only because they are his and Utemuratov’s busi­ness com­peti­tors in Kazakhstan, but, more impor­tant­ly, because Ablyazov holds strong far-right beliefs. He sim­ply hates them because they are not Kazakhs, but Uzbeks and Israelis. In his mind, they are sub-humans who deserve the same fate that Uzbeks had in Kyrgyzstan in 2010.

If the infor­ma­tion pro­vid­ed by Intelligence Online is cor­rect, it seems we now have a Belgian par­lia­men­tary com­mis­sion who is ready, know­ing­ly or not, to fight open­ly for the inter­ests of the worst kind of Kazakh oli­garchs – those who com­bine fraud­u­lent eco­nom­ic pow­er with a qua­si-fas­cist ideology.

In the mean­time, those who did change the law in Belgium are doing just fine. Nobody seems to both­er them – see here: http://www.opensourceinvestigations.com/belgium/van-der-maelen-busts-kazakhgate-commission/, and here: http://www.opensourceinvestigations.com/belgium/diamondgate-cdv-affair/.

The Kazakhgate Relay:

Ingen kommentarer endnu

Der er endnu ingen kommentarer til indlægget. Hvis du synes indlægget er interessant, så vær den første til at kommentere på indlægget.

Skriv et svar

Skriv et svar

Din e-mailadresse vil ikke blive publiceret. Krævede felter er markeret med *

 

Næste indlæg

chodiev fattah kayumovich ordered the murder of